Rulings (9)
  • Amazon Europe Core Sarl t/a Amazon.co.uk

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 10 June 2026

    A paid-for Instagram ad for Amazon Fresh UK broke the rules by featuring an identifiable less healthy food product.

  • Beauty Pie Ltd t/a Beauty Pie Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Poster
    • 10 June 2026

    A poster for an LED face mask made misleading claims that it was clinically proven to reduce wrinkles in 4 weeks.

  • Dribble Media Ltd t/a Midnite

    • Not upheld
    • Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)
    • 10 June 2026

    A TikTok post on Mia Mon’s account promoting an online betting platform didn’t feature someone who was likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s.

  • Fortore Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 10 June 2026

    A paid-for Facebook ad for an investment competition website failed to make clear that gold and precious metal investment was unregulated and that the value of investments was variable.

  • Montford Group Ltd t/a Brittania Bullion

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 10 June 2026

    A paid-for LinkedIn ad for a gold investment company failed to make clear that physical gold investment was unregulated and that the value of investments was variable.

  • RE/MAX Property Specialists t/a Billie Dunlop

    • Upheld
    • Social media (own site)
    • 10 June 2026

    A leaflet and a Facebook post for an estate agency service made misleading and unverifiable comparisons with identifiable competitors.

  • Rosland Capital Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 10 June 2026

    A paid-for Facebook ad for a gold and precious metal specialist failed to make clear that gold and precious metal investment was unregulated and that the value of investments was variable.

  • Sourced Consultancy Ltd t/a Oak & Mason

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 10 June 2026

    A paid-for Meta ad for a gold investment company failed to make clear that physical gold investment was unregulated and that the value of investments was variable. The ad also broke the rules by referencing an example of past performance that was unrepresentative.

  • Tarvos Ltd t/a 7879

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 10 June 2026

    A paid-for Meta ad for an online retailer of gold and platinum jewellery failed to make clear that physical gold and precious metal investment was unregulated and that the value of investments was variable.

Informally resolved (1)
  • Cell Regeneration Ltd

    • 10 June 2026
    • Number of complaints: 1