Rulings (82)
  • Femtech Healthcare Ltd t/a KeyForHer

    • Upheld
    • 26 June 2024

    A paid-for Facebook ad for Key, a supplement company, seen on 5 April 2024, included a caption that stated, “Use code TRYKEY for 20% off + Free Shipping on your first one-time purchase of Key For Peri + Menopause”.The ad featured a video of a woman talking about the product that included the claims, “It’s the most comp...

  • Rejuvit Labs, LLC t/a Rejuvit Ageless Vitality, Rejuvit Graceful Ageing

    • Upheld
    • 26 June 2024

    Two paid-for Facebook ads for Rejuvit, a supplement company, seen on 5 April 2024:a. A paid-for Facebook ad for Rejuvit Ageless Vitality, included a caption that stated “Get Up To 35% Off Rejuvit Menopause Relief”. The ad included a quote from a customer that stated, “I’m telling you, once you start, you’ll keep seeing...

  • BetterMe Ltd t/a Better Me

    • Upheld
    • 19 June 2024

    BetterMe Ltd: A paid-for TikTok ad misleadingly represented and exaggerated the physique that could be obtained by using an exercise programme.

  • Nutritional Sciences Ltd t/a Physical Nutrition

    • Upheld
    • 19 June 2024

    Nutritional Sciences Ltd: An ad made unauthorised health claims, implied that a food supplement could prevent, treat or cure human disease and made misleading claims regarding an alleged testimonial from a doctor.    

  • XIX Vodka Ltd

    • Upheld in part
    • 12 June 2024

    A YouTube video on the Sidemen’s YouTube channel, seen on 8 October 2023. The video was titled “KSI & W2S CONTROL THE SIDEMEN FOR THE DAY”. The video featured the Sidemen doing challenges around London in two teams. At approximately 16 minutes into the video, a title card quickly appeared that rep...

  • Alzheimer's Society

    • Not Upheld
    • 05 June 2024

    Three TV ads and a radio ad for a charity were not irresponsible, did not cause serious or widespread offence, and did not cause unjustifiable distress.

  • Kingsland Drinks Ltd t/a Kingsland Wines & Spirits

    • Upheld
    • 22 May 2024

    A label on a bottle mislead consumers by failing to disclose the significant conditions of a competition.

  • Hangcure Ltd t/a Hangcure

    • Upheld
    • Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)
    • 15 May 2024

    A TikTok ad for a hangover cure claimed that a food supplement could treat human disease.

  • Tecnología Sostenible y Responsable SL (TSR) t/a Sustainable and Responsible Technology SL

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 08 May 2024

    A paid-for X ad made misleading claims about the effect of blue light on eyes.

  • Lark Holdings Limited

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 01 May 2024

    A website misleadingly claimed that a programme could permanently eliminate an array of mental health disorders and discouraged essential treatment for conditions for which medical supervision should be sought.

  • Postcode Lottery Ltd t/a People's Postcode Lottery

    • Not upheld
    • Television
    • 01 May 2024

    A TV ad for the Postcode Lottery featuring Emma Willis was not likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s.

  • GKOnlineCo Pty Ltd t/a Pups Den, Official Aida Store

    • Upheld
    • Internet (website content)
    • 24 April 2024

    A paid-for social media ad made medicinal claims about an unlicenced product.

  • infirst Ltd t/a Flarin

    • Television
    • 17 April 2024

    A TV ad misleadingly implied that Flarin was better for treating joint pain than other ibuprofen products.

  • John Mills Ltd t/a JML Direct

    • Upheld
    • Television
    • 03 April 2024

    A TV ad featured a testimonial which misleadingly implied a heated drying pod could prevent condensation form forming.

  • Mous Products Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Television
    • 03 April 2024

    A TV ad made misleading claims about the efficacy of a range of phone cases.

  • Nationwide Building Society t/a Nationwide

    • Upheld
    • Press general, Television, Radio
    • 03 April 2024

    TV, radio and press ads for Nationwide were misleading as consumers were likely to understand that the building society had made a long-term decision not to close their branches and that they had not recently closed any branches when this was not the case.

  • Not Guilty Food Co Ltd t/a The Skinny Food Co

    • Upheld
    • Social media (influencer or affiliate ad)
    • 03 April 2024

    An Instagram Reel on Katie Price’s account was not obviously recognisable as an ad, irresponsibly promoted a diet that fell below 800 calories a day, and made weight loss claims for the products shown that aren’t authorised on the GB NHC Register.

  • John Mills Ltd t/a JML Direct

    • Upheld
    • Television
    • 27 March 2024

    A TV ad for a cleaning tool presented gender stereotypes in a way that was likely to cause harm.

  • DUSK (Retail) Ltd

    • Not upheld
    • Television
    • 20 March 2024

    A TV ad was not likely to cause serious or widespread offence over its portrayal of men.

  • LeoVegas Gaming plc t/a Bet MGM

    • Not upheld
    • Television
    • 20 March 2024

    A TV ad for Bet MGM featuring Chris Rock was not likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s.

Informally resolved (2)
  • Jahangir Group Ltd t/a ShopVistaa

    • 26 June 2024
    • Number of complaints: 0

    Topic: Health conditions

  • Whitbread Group plc

    • 05 June 2024
    • Number of complaints: 1

    Topic: Alcohol