-
Online Classifieds AG t/a PURE
Two posters for the PURE Dating App, seen in March 2024: a. The poster depicted four images of cartoon style heads, next to text that stated, “IT’S A GOOD DAY TO GET SOME HEAD” and “ON PURE DATING APP” followed by a QR code. b. The poster depicted a cartoon head of a princess, next t...
-
Hing Fo International Ltd t/a ALFABAR
A poster for an electronic cigarettes brand was irresponsible for being likely to appeal particularly to under-18s, but was not inappropriately targeted.
-
Calvin Klein Inc
[Republished ruling] Three posters for Calvin Klein did not objectify women, but one was inappropriate for display in an untargeted medium.
-
Brown-Forman Beverages Europe Ltd t/a Jack Daniel's
A poster irresponsibly implied that drinking alcohol could overcome boredom and promoted adopting unwise drinking styles.
-
Rebecca Louise t/a rebeccalouise95
A poster for a model’s OnlyFans account was inappropriately targeted and likely to cause widespread offence.
-
GIRLvsCANCER
An outdoor poster that referenced a swear word was likely to cause serious or widespread offence and was inappropriate for an untargeted medium.
-
Em Rose
A poster for an OnlyFans account was irresponsibly placed and likely to cause widespread offence.
-
Kentucky Fried Chicken (Great Britain) Ltd t/a KFC
An email and two outdoor poster ads for KFC, seen in October and November 2023: a. The email included an image with text that stated “FINALLY F CKIN’ GOOD”. The letters between the “F” and “CKIN’” were covered by chips. Text underneath stated "NOT-SO HUMBLE BRAG. ...
-
Imiracle (HK) Ltd t/a ELFBAR
A poster ad and digital billboard ad for Elfbar vapes misleadingly omitted information about limited recycling options, mislead about the environmental benefit the products offered and misleadingly highlighted an environmental benefit that comes from a legal obligation which also impacts competing products.
-
Toyota (GB) plc
A paid-for Facebook post and a poster ad condoned using vehicles in a way that disregarded their impact on nature and the environment, and as such were socially irresponsible.
-
Norfolk Dinosaur Park Ltd t/a PrimEvil
A poster for a horror-themed Halloween event was likely to cause children fear or distress.
-
London and Quadrant Housing Trust
A poster for shared ownership property was not administered fairly and did not make the terms of the promotion sufficiently clear.
-
JD Sports Fashion plc
A poster for JD Sports and Adidas irresponsibly portrayed unsafe driving practices.
-
EE Ltd t/a EE
Ads for EE did not provide sufficient information for consumers to verify comparisons with identifiable competitors and inadequately signposted consumers to such information.
-
Eliza Rose Watson t/a elizarosewatson
A poster which featured an image of model and influencer Eliza Rose Watson alongside the OnlyFans logo was unlikely to cause serious or widespread offence and had not been placed irresponsibly.
-
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) Foundation t/a PETA
A billboard for PETA was unlikely to cause serious or widespread offence and was responsibly targeted.
-
Dolphin Fitness Ltd
Topic: Sports, leisure and hobbies
-
Ello Group Ltd t/a Coffee Club
Topic: Food, drink and supplements
-
Lumi Skn Ltd
Topic: Medical devices