Rulings (49)
  • Stirling Health Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Press other (paid ad)
    • 20 November 2024

    A press ad made medicinal claims for an unauthorised product.

  • Go Night Night (unconfirmed)

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 30 October 2024

    A website for a sleep consultancy company misleadingly featured the logo of a professional standards body that it wasn't registered with.  

  • The Boots Company plc

    • Upheld
    • Television, Video on demand
    • 30 October 2024

    A TV and Video on Demand (VOD) ad condoned not using sunscreen.

  • Fanfinders Ltd

    • Upheld
    • 09 October 2024

    A paid-for Facebook ad promoting a free baby box featured an image which didn’t accurately represent what customers received.

  • Excite For Life Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Internet (website content)
    • 18 September 2024

    A website made misleading claims that CBD was suitable for consumption by children, incorrectly stated that the recommended maximum consumption of CBD per day for adults was 70 mg and made general health claims that weren't accompanied by an authorised specific health claim.

  • Vape Life Ltd t/a CBDLife UK

    • Upheld
    • Internet (website content)
    • 18 September 2024

    A website made misleading claims that CBD was suitable for consumption by children and incorrectly stated that the recommended maximum consumption of CBD per day for adults was 70 mg.

  • Femgroup Ltd t/a Feminapause

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 11 September 2024

    A paid-for Facebook ad made claims that a supplement could treat symptoms of the menopause and misleadingly implied that the supplement had been approved by the Food Standards Agency.

  • 247 Home Furnishings Ltd t/a 247Blinds

    • Upheld
    • Internet (website content)
    • 04 September 2024

    A website ad which made references to blindness were likely to cause serious or widespread offence on the grounds of disability.

  • Mayborn (UK) Ltd t/a Tommee Tippee

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 04 September 2024

    A paid-for Instagram ad for a device for removing air particles from milk made unsubstantiated efficacy claims for treating colic and its symptoms.

  • Hike Future Ltd t/a Hike Footwear

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 28 August 2024

     Three paid-for Facebook ads made misleading claims about a money back guarantee, made medical claims for unlicensed products and featured testimonials that weren’t genuine.

  • The Edinburgh Herbal Dispensary Ltd t/a Napiers Edinburgh

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 14 August 2024

    Five TikTok ads made medicinal claims for an unlicenced product.

  • Flow Neuroscience AB t/a Flow

    • Upheld
    • Internet
    • 07 August 2024

    An ad on Gemma Collins' Instagram account discouraged treatment for depression, a condition for which medical supervision should be sought.

  • MedTech Global LLP t/a Orthoback

    • Upheld
    • Internet
    • 07 August 2024

    A website and Facebook ad made unsubstantiated savings claims, made misleading claims about the advertiser's money-back guarantee and returns policy, and made medical claims for an unlicenced product which did not have the relevant compliance labels.   

  • Person(s) unknown t/a Nultqh GB

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 31 July 2024

    A paid-for Meta ad for a prostate patch made medicinal claims for an unlicensed product.

  • Person(s) unknown t/a Cishx GB

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 31 July 2024

    A paid-for Meta ad which claimed that underwear could treat prostate issues made medical claims for a device that didn’t hold the applicable conformity marking and was not registered with the MHRA.

  • Person(s) unknown t/a Cheerchest Cove

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 31 July 2024

    A paid-for Meta ad for prostate cream made medicinal claims for an unlicensed product.

  • Ejec Ventures LLC t/a Auri Nutrition

    • Upheld
    • Internet
    • 24 July 2024

    A paid-for Facebook ad made claims that a supplement could eliminate stress and also made unauthorised specific health claims and general health claims.

  • Innocent Health Ltd t/a Novomins Nutrition

    • Upheld
    • Internet
    • 24 July 2024

    A paid-for Facebook ad made claims that a supplement could treat anxiety and also made unauthorised specific health claims and general health claims.

  • Nowt Ventures Ltd t/a Feel Güd

    • Upheld
    • 24 July 2024

    Four paid-for Facebook ads made claims that a supplement could treat anxiety and also made unauthorised specific health claims and general health claims.  

  • Nutriburst Ltd t/a Nutriburst Vitamins

    • Upheld
    • Internet
    • 24 July 2024

    A paid-for Facebook ad made claims that a supplement could treat anxiety and also made unauthorised specific health claims and general health claims.

Informally resolved (2)
  • Rakhee Mediratta

    • 24 July 2024
    • Number of complaints: 0

    Topic: Medicines, remedies and therapies

  • Jahangir Group Ltd t/a ShopVistaa

    • 26 June 2024
    • Number of complaints: 0

    Topic: Health conditions