-
Aurum & Argenti Ltd t/a Bullion Club, bullionclub.co.uk
A paid-for Google ad failed to make clear that gold investment was unregulated, that the value of investments was variable and that examples of past performance weren’t necessarily a guide to the future.
-
Gold Warehouse Ltd t/a Gold Bank
Three radio ads, which implied that gold had investment potential, were broadcast on a non-specialist radio channel.
-
Gold Warehouse Ltd t/a Gold Bank
A press ad failed to make clear that gold investment was unregulated and that the value of investments was variable.
-
Harrington & Byrne Ltd
A press ad failed to make clear that gold investment was unregulated, that the value of investments was variable and that examples of past performance weren’t necessarily a guide to the future.
-
Solomon Global Ltd t/a Buy Bullion
A paid for Facebook ad failed to make clear that gold investment was unregulated, that the value of investments was variable and that examples of past performance weren’t necessarily a guide to the future.
-
The Pure Gold Group Ltd t/a The Pure Gold Company
Two paid-for Google ads failed to make clear that gold investment was unregulated and that the value of investments was variable.
-
Cult & Boutique (Wine Management) Ltd
A paid-for Facebook ad failed to make sufficiently clear that wine investment was unregulated, that the value of investments was variable and that examples of past performance weren’t necessarily a guide to the future. The ads also made unsubstantiated investment claims.
-
Cult Wines Ltd
Two paid-for Google ads failed to make sufficiently clear that wine investment was unregulated, that the value of investments was variable and that examples of past performance weren’t necessarily a guide to the future.
-
Vintage Associates Fine Wine Merchants Ltd
Two paid for social media ads failed to make sufficiently clear that wine investment was unregulated, that the value of investments was variable and that examples of past performance weren’t necessarily a guide to the future. The ads also referenced an example of performance that wasn’t representative and m...
-
Vinverum Ltd
A paid-for Facebook ad failed to make sufficiently clear that wine investment was unregulated and that the value of investments was variable and also made unsubstantiated investment claims.
-
CurrencyWave Ltd t/a CurrencyWave
A website for a foreign currency payments service misleadingly implied they conducted foreign exchange payments and were FCA authorised, and also used inaccurate cost comparison information.
-
Eurostar International Ltd
A paid for Instagram post and a post on Eurostar’s Facebook page exaggerated the number of tickets available at a certain price and omitted material information about the dates tickets were available for.
-
Trav Expert Ltd t/a Travelcrew
Prices on a website for a retailer of flights and holidays were misleading because the advertiser did not hold evidence to show they were genuine and included all non-optional taxes, duties, fees and charges that applied to all or most buyers or that they were subject to change and that availability was limited.
-
Sunspot Tours Ltd t/a Mercury Holidays
A national press ad for a package holiday misleadingly described a holiday as including a "free" week.
-
Mazda Motors UK Ltd
A paid-for Meta ad for the Mazda2 Hybrid car gave a misleading impression of the vehicle’s environment impact and made absolute claims that couldn’t be evidenced.
-
Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd t/a Virgin Atlantic
A radio ad for Virgin Atlantic included the unqualified claim "100% sustainable aviation fuel", which gave a misleading impression of the fuel's environmental impact.
-
Debenhams Brands Ltd t/a Debenhams
A paid-for Facebook ad for Debenhams made misleading and unsubstantiated savings claims
-
The Benenden Healthcare Society Ltd
A TV and Radio ad for private health insurance mislead consumers by omitting material information about a healthcare plan, including significant exclusions relating to treatment options.
-
Hurtigruten UK Ltd t/a HX Hurtigruten Expeditions
A paid-for ad in a digital newspaper for a cruise made misleading and unsubstantiated claims about the environmental impact of the expedition and failed to make the basis of these environmental claims clear.
-
London Luton Airport Ltd t/a Luton Rising
A magazine ad and a poster for Luton Rising did not adequately qualify the claims made in the ad and omitted material information about the environmental impact of London Luton Airport’s expansion.
-
Jetline Travel Ltd t/a Jetline Travel
Media: Email
Topic: Holidays, travel and motoring -
Direct Ferries Ltd t/a Direct Ferries
Topic: Holidays, travel and motoring
-
We Love Holidays Ltd t/a LoveHolidays
Topic: Holidays, travel and motoring
-
Air France-KLM t/a Air France
Topic: Holidays, travel and motoring
-
Awaze Vacation Rentals Ltd t/a Hoseasons, Cottages.com
Topic: Holidays, travel and motoring
-
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd t/a NCL
Topic: Holidays, travel and motoring
-
RAC Motoring Services t/a RAC Motoring Services
Topic: Holidays, travel and motoring
-
Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd t/a Virgin Atlantic
Topic: Holidays, travel and motoring