Rulings (15)
  • DeVosVoorzieningen BVBA t/a Qinux TitanPG

    • Upheld
    • 13 November 2024

    A pre-roll YouTube ad made unsubstantiated claims about the features and popularity of a smart watch.

  • British Telecommunications plc t/a BT

    • Upheld
    • 09 October 2024

    A webpage on the BT website didn’t make clear that their broadband contracts would be subject to mid-contract price increases.

  • EE Ltd t/a EE

    • Upheld
    • 09 October 2024

    A webpage on the EE website didn’t make clear that their broadband contracts would be subject to mid-contract price increases.

  • Plusnet plc

    • Upheld
    • 09 October 2024

    A webpage on the Plusnet plc website didn’t make clear that their broadband contracts would be subject to mid-contract price increases.

  • TalkTalk Telecom Ltd t/a TalkTalk

    • Upheld
    • 09 October 2024

    A webpage on the TalkTalk website didn’t make clear that their broadband contracts would be subject to mid-contract price increases.

  • Telefonica UK Ltd t/a O2

    • Upheld
    • 09 October 2024

    A webpage on the O2 website didn’t make clear that their broadband contracts would be subject to mid-contract price increase.

  • Virgin Media Ltd

    • Upheld
    • 09 October 2024

    A webpage on the Virgin Media website didn’t make clear that their broadband contracts would be subject to mid-contract price increases.

  • Vodafone Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad), Television
    • 18 September 2024

    A TV ad, paid-for X ad and website for Vodafone made unsubstantiated claims that their broadband services provided a nearly identical performance to BT's services, and that millions of BT broadband customers had already switched, or were actively considering switching, to Vodafone.

  • Electronic Arts Ltd t/a EA

    • Upheld
    • 10 July 2024

    A paid-for Facebook ad for a mobile app game did not make it sufficiently clear that the game contained loot boxes.

  • Mous Products Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Television
    • 03 April 2024

    A TV ad made misleading claims about the efficacy of a range of phone cases.

  • 6G Internet Ltd t/a 6Gi

    • Upheld
    • Leaflet
    • 06 March 2024

    A leaflet for a home broadband provider made misleading claims about providing full fibre broadband.

  • Planet Computers Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Internet (website content)
    • 10 January 2024

    A website misleadingly stated when a smartphone would be in stock.

  • Zzoomm plc

    • Upheld
    • Direct mail
    • 10 January 2024

    A direct mailing misleadingly stated the savings someone could make with their broadband service.

  • Virgin Media Ltd t/a Virgin Media

    • Upheld
    • Internet (website content)
    • 13 December 2023

    A website claiming that the provider offered "the fastest WiFi Guarantee of any major provider" was misleading.

  • Polyverse Inc

    • Upheld
    • App (paid ad)
    • 06 December 2023

    An in-game mobile app ad was irresponsible, likely to cause serious and widespread offence and had been irresponsibly targeted for overly sexualising and objectifying women.

Informally resolved (4)
  • Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd t/a Samsung

    • 24 July 2024
    • Number of complaints: 0

    Topic: Computers, phones and telecoms

  • Zen Internet Ltd

    • 19 June 2024
    • Number of complaints: 1

    Topic: Computers, phones and telecoms

  • Phonely Ltd t/a Phonely

    • 12 June 2024
    • Number of complaints: 1

    Topic: Computers, phones and telecoms

  • Virgin Media Ltd.

    • 05 June 2024
    • Number of complaints: 1

    Topic: Computers, phones and telecoms