-
Dataverse Co. Limited t/a Gamehaus
Three paid-for TikTok ads for a social casino game app misleadingly implied that people could win real-world money or tangible prizes through gameplay when this wasn’t the case.
-
Huuuge Global Limited t/a Billionaire Casino
Two paid-for TikTok ads for a social casino game app misleadingly implied that people could win real-world money or tangible prizes through gameplay when this wasn’t the case.
-
Mobee Co Ltd t/a Ignite Classic Slots
Two paid-for TikTok ads for a social casino game app misleadingly implied that people could win real-world money or tangible prizes through gameplay when this wasn’t the case.
-
SpinX Games Ltd
Two paid-for TikTok ads for a social casino game app misleadingly implied that people could win real-world money or tangible prizes through gameplay when this wasn’t the case.
-
Zeroo Gravity Games LLC t/a Cash Tornado
Two paid-for TikTok ads for a social casino game app misleadingly implied that people could win real-world money or tangible prizes through gameplay when this wasn’t the case.
-
JD Sports Fashion plc
A Facebook page, a Facebook reel, a paid-for Facebook post and a poster condoned irresponsible, unsafe driving, but didn’t irresponsibly feature riders not wearing protective gear.
-
LC International Ltd t/a Coral
A mobile digital billboard ad for Coral was not inappropriately placed.
-
WHG (International) Ltd t/a William Hill Online
A paid-for search ad and a website for William Hill advertising a new customer welcome bonus misled consumers by failing to include all significant conditions of the promotion and by not positioning the conditions prominently.
-
GB Sports Advisors Ltd t/a Geoff Banks Online
A website ad offering a free bet failed to include all the significant conditions of the promotion.
-
Electronic Arts Ltd t/a EA
A paid-for Facebook ad for a mobile app game did not make it sufficiently clear that the game contained loot boxes.
-
Festival Free Bets
A post on Astrid Wett’s X (formerly Twitter) page, advertising a company that collated betting offers, broke gambling ad rules by featuring someone under 25.
-
ProgressPlay Ltd
A website advertising a gambling promotion failed to disclose significant conditions of entry.
-
Postcode Lottery Ltd t/a People's Postcode Lottery
A TV ad for the Postcode Lottery featuring Emma Willis was not likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s.
-
Top Games Inc
A paid-for X ad for the game Evony: The King’s Return featured gameplay that was not representative of the actual game.
-
Electronic Arts Ltd t/a EA
Two paid-for Facebook ads for Golf Clash, a mobile app game, omitted material information about the inclusion of loot boxes.
-
Jagex Ltd
A paid-for Facebook ad for online game RuneScape omitted material information about the inclusion of loot boxes.
-
LeoVegas Gaming plc t/a Bet MGM
A TV ad for Bet MGM featuring Chris Rock was not likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s.
-
Lindar Media Ltd t/a MRQ.com
A paid-for Facebook ad for gaming website MrQ.com featured cartoon imagery that was likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s.
-
Miniclip (UK) Ltd
A paid-for Facebook ad for an online game omitted material information about the inclusion of loot boxes.
-
Jumpman Gaming Ltd t/a Lights Camera Bingo
A TV ad for Lucky Cow Bingo did not feature content that was likely to be of strong appeal to under-18s.
-
G.Network Communications Ltd
-
X-Clusive Competitions Ltd
-
AG Communications Ltd
-
Dolphin Fitness Ltd
-
Spotlight Sports Group Ltd.