Rulings (14)
  • 2XU UK Limited

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 16 April 2025

    A paid-for Instagram ad for 2xu Recovery Compression Tights made medical claims without holding the applicable conformity marking and were not registered with the MHRA.

  • Belle Baby Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 09 April 2025

    A website, which featured a product listing for a swimsuit, included an image of a child portrayed in a sexual way.

  • A3 Games Pte Ltd t/a Top Girl

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 26 March 2025

    A paid-for Facebook ad was socially irresponsible and caused serious or widespread offence, including by featuring a harmful gender stereotype by objectifying and sexualising women.

  • Shenzhenshi Senyi Dianzi Shangwu Youxiangongsi t/a Plum-Marketing

    • Upheld
    • Internet (classified)
    • 12 March 2025

    An Amazon product listing was socially irresponsible as it condoned an unsafe practice and featured very young children playing with a toy that was likely to cause them physical harm. 

  • Wilton Bradley Ltd t/a Xootz

    • Upheld
    • 12 February 2025

    A TV ad and product page was misleading and socially irresponsible by failing to disclose that private e-scooters couldn’t be legally used in public places.

  • Astrasoft Projects Ltd t/a Sofiadate.com

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 05 February 2025

    A paid-for Facebook ad featured harmful stereotypes likely to cause serious or widespread offence. 

  • DragonPlus Game Ltd t/a Happy Hospital

    • Upheld
    • In-game (apps)
    • 05 February 2025

    An in-app ad was socially irresponsible and caused unjustified distress and serious offence by trivialising miscarriage and stillbirth. 

  • Wireless Group Media (GB) Ltd t/a Virgin Radio

    • Upheld
    • Website (own site)
    • 05 February 2025

    A promotion on Virgin Radio's website wasn't administered fairly and caused unnecessary disappointment.

  • Guangzhou Shimo Culture Media Co Ltd

    • Upheld
    • In-game (apps)
    • 11 December 2024

    An in-game ad was irresponsibly targeted, socially irresponsible and caused serious offense by featuring a harmful stereotype by objectifying and sexualising women.

  • Metamind AI Ltd t/a AI Persona

    • Upheld
    • In-game advertising
    • 11 December 2024

    An in-game ad was socially irresponsible, caused offense by harmfully stereotyping women as sexual objects and portrayed someone who seemed to be under-18 in a sexual way.

  • Bodystreet Franchise (UK) Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 04 December 2024

    A paid-for Instagram ad for a fitness centre made misleading claims that a 20-minute session per week was equivalent to three one-hour sessions at a regular gym.

  • JD Sports Fashion plc

    • Upheld in part
    • Internet
    • 28 August 2024

     A Facebook page, a Facebook reel, a paid-for Facebook post and a poster condoned irresponsible, unsafe driving, but didn’t irresponsibly feature riders not wearing protective gear.

  • Electronic Arts Ltd t/a EA

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 10 July 2024

    A paid-for Facebook ad for a mobile app game did not make it sufficiently clear that the game contained loot boxes.

  • Sony Interactive Entertainment Network Europe Ltd t/a PlaySation

    • Not upheld
    • 22 May 2024

    An ad for 'Call of Duty Modern Warfare III' was not irresponsibly targeted.

Informally resolved (2)
  • G.Network Communications Ltd

    • 07 August 2024
    • Number of complaints: 0

    Media: Internet
    Topic: Sports, leisure and hobbies

  • Dolphin Fitness Ltd

    • 12 June 2024
    • Number of complaints: 1

    Topic: Sports, leisure and hobbies