-
DeVosVoorzieningen BVBA t/a Qinux TitanPG
A pre-roll YouTube ad made unsubstantiated claims about the features and popularity of a smart watch.
-
British Telecommunications plc t/a BT
A webpage on the BT website didn’t make clear that their broadband contracts would be subject to mid-contract price increases.
-
EE Ltd t/a EE
A webpage on the EE website didn’t make clear that their broadband contracts would be subject to mid-contract price increases.
-
Plusnet plc
A webpage on the Plusnet plc website didn’t make clear that their broadband contracts would be subject to mid-contract price increases.
-
TalkTalk Telecom Ltd t/a TalkTalk
A webpage on the TalkTalk website didn’t make clear that their broadband contracts would be subject to mid-contract price increases.
-
Telefonica UK Ltd t/a O2
A webpage on the O2 website didn’t make clear that their broadband contracts would be subject to mid-contract price increase.
-
Virgin Media Ltd
A webpage on the Virgin Media website didn’t make clear that their broadband contracts would be subject to mid-contract price increases.
-
Wenzhou Xinyu Maoyi Youxian Gongsi t/a XINYU TRADE
Two Instagram stories on Mel Lloyd’s account featuring affiliate links weren't obviously identifiable as ads.
-
Vodafone Ltd
A TV ad, paid-for X ad and website for Vodafone made unsubstantiated claims that their broadband services provided a nearly identical performance to BT's services, and that millions of BT broadband customers had already switched, or were actively considering switching, to Vodafone.
-
CPD Regulatory Office
A website made misleading claims about being affiliated with government bodies, misleading claims to have accreditation providers that met government-approved standards, and misleadingly using organisations’ names and logos to suggest an affiliation.
-
ZOE Ltd
A paid-for Facebook ad for Zoe featuring a testimonial from Steven Bartlett misleadingly omitted that he was an investor in the company.
-
Electronic Arts Ltd t/a EA
A paid-for Facebook ad for a mobile app game did not make it sufficiently clear that the game contained loot boxes.
-
Independent British Vape Trade Association t/a IBVTA
A newspaper advertorial indirectly promoted unlicenced e-cigarettes.
-
Whitbread Group plc t/a Premier Inn, Beefeater
A paid-for search ad made misleading claims about the price of hotel rooms.
-
XC Trains Ltd t/a Cross Country Trains
A webpage made misleading claims about the availability of complimentary food and drink for First Class passengers on Cross Country Trains.
-
The Sky Mining Company Ltd t/a Sky Mining
A press ad, Instagram ad and website did not make it clear that the company’s diamonds were synthetic, which was misleading.
-
John Mills Ltd t/a JML Direct
A TV ad featured a testimonial which misleadingly implied a heated drying pod could prevent condensation form forming.
-
Mous Products Ltd
A TV ad made misleading claims about the efficacy of a range of phone cases.
-
Nationwide Building Society t/a Nationwide
TV, radio and press ads for Nationwide were misleading as consumers were likely to understand that the building society had made a long-term decision not to close their branches and that they had not recently closed any branches when this was not the case.
-
Not Guilty Food Co Ltd t/a The Skinny Food Co
An Instagram Reel on Katie Price’s account was not obviously recognisable as an ad, irresponsibly promoted a diet that fell below 800 calories a day, and made weight loss claims for the products shown that aren’t authorised on the GB NHC Register.
-
Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd t/a Samsung
Topic: Computers, phones and telecoms
-
Sophie Church t/a sophie__church
Topic: Claims, endorsements and testimonials
-
Zen Internet Ltd
Topic: Computers, phones and telecoms
-
Phonely Ltd t/a Phonely
Topic: Computers, phones and telecoms
-
Virgin Media Ltd.
Topic: Computers, phones and telecoms