-
ACME Vape Ltd
A cinema ad and post seen on IVG Vape’s LinkedIn page made unsubstantiated health claims and promoted unlicensed nicotine-containing vapes in unpermitted media but wasn’t directed at people under 18 through the selection of media in which it appeared.
-
Apollo Future Technology Ltd
A webpage for an affiliate programme for vaping products broke the rules by indirectly promoting unlicensed nicotine-containing e-cigarettes and their components.
-
Magflo Ltd t/a JAC Vapour
A webpage for an affiliate programme for vaping products broke the rules by indirectly promoting unlicensed nicotine-containing e-cigarettes and their components.
-
Pixus Online Ltd t/a Juicemate
A webpage for an affiliate programme for vaping products broke the rules by indirectly promoting unlicensed nicotine-containing e-cigarettes and their components.
-
iVape London Ltd
An email broke the rules by directly promoting to consumers unlicensed nicotine-containing e-cigarettes and their components.
-
Independent British Vape Trade Association t/a IBVTA
A newspaper advertorial indirectly promoted unlicenced e-cigarettes.
-
Hing Fo International Ltd t/a ALFABAR
A poster for an electronic cigarettes brand was irresponsible for being likely to appeal particularly to under-18s, but was not inappropriately targeted.
-
GoBrands Euro Intermediate Holdings SARL t/a gopuff
Media: Internet
Topic: Vaping, smoking and drugs -
iVape21
Topic: Vaping, smoking and drugs