-
Apollo Future Technology Ltd
A webpage for an affiliate programme for vaping products broke the rules by indirectly promoting unlicensed nicotine-containing e-cigarettes and their components.
-
Magflo Ltd t/a JAC Vapour
A webpage for an affiliate programme for vaping products broke the rules by indirectly promoting unlicensed nicotine-containing e-cigarettes and their components.
-
Pixus Online Ltd t/a Juicemate
A webpage for an affiliate programme for vaping products broke the rules by indirectly promoting unlicensed nicotine-containing e-cigarettes and their components.
-
iVape London Ltd
An email broke the rules by directly promoting to consumers unlicensed nicotine-containing e-cigarettes and their components.
-
Independent British Vape Trade Association t/a IBVTA
A newspaper advertorial indirectly promoted unlicenced e-cigarettes.
-
Hing Fo International Ltd t/a ALFABAR
A poster for an electronic cigarettes brand was irresponsible for being likely to appeal particularly to under-18s, but was not inappropriately targeted.
-
Supreme CBD Ltd t/a Supreme CBD
Four posts on X (formerly Twitter) were not obviously identifiable as ads, and claimed that a food could treat insomnia and anxiety.
-
Imiracle (HK) Ltd t/a ELFBAR
A poster ad and digital billboard ad for Elfbar vapes misleadingly omitted information about limited recycling options, mislead about the environmental benefit the products offered and misleadingly highlighted an environmental benefit that comes from a legal obligation which also impacts competing products.
-
ACME Vape Ltd
Two TikTok posts on the IVG TikTok account promoted unlicensed, nicotine-containing e-cigarettes
-
Cloud City Vapez UK Ltd
A TikTok post on Harleigh Perez’s account promoted unlicensed, nicotine-containing e-cigarettes.
-
GoBrands Euro Intermediate Holdings SARL t/a gopuff
Media: Internet
Topic: Vaping, smoking and drugs -
iVape21
Topic: Vaping, smoking and drugs