Rulings (29)
  • Aurum & Argenti Ltd t/a Bullion Club, bullionclub.co.uk

    • Upheld
    • Website (paid ad)
    • 20 November 2024

    A paid-for Google ad failed to make clear that gold investment was unregulated, that the value of investments was variable and that examples of past performance weren’t necessarily a guide to the future.

  • Gold Warehouse Ltd t/a Gold Bank

    • Upheld
    • Radio
    • 20 November 2024

    Three radio ads, which implied that gold had investment potential, were broadcast on a non-specialist radio channel.

  • Gold Warehouse Ltd t/a Gold Bank

    • Upheld
    • Press other (paid ad)
    • 20 November 2024

    A press ad failed to make clear that gold investment was unregulated and that the value of investments was variable.

  • Harrington & Byrne Ltd

    • Upheld
    • Press other (paid ad)
    • 20 November 2024

    A press ad failed to make clear that gold investment was unregulated, that the value of investments was variable and that examples of past performance weren’t necessarily a guide to the future.

  • Solomon Global Ltd t/a Buy Bullion

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 20 November 2024

    A paid for Facebook ad failed to make clear that gold investment was unregulated, that the value of investments was variable and that examples of past performance weren’t necessarily a guide to the future.

  • The Pure Gold Group Ltd t/a The Pure Gold Company

    • Upheld
    • Website (paid ad)
    • 20 November 2024

    Two paid-for Google ads failed to make clear that gold investment was unregulated and that the value of investments was variable.

  • Cult & Boutique (Wine Management) Ltd

    • Upheld
    • 13 November 2024

    A paid-for Facebook ad failed to make sufficiently clear that wine investment was unregulated, that the value of investments was variable and that examples of past performance weren’t necessarily a guide to the future. The ads also made unsubstantiated investment claims.

  • Cult Wines Ltd

    • Upheld
    • 13 November 2024

    Two paid-for Google ads failed to make sufficiently clear that wine investment was unregulated, that the value of investments was variable and that examples of past performance weren’t necessarily a guide to the future.

  • Vintage Associates Fine Wine Merchants Ltd

    • Upheld
    • 13 November 2024

    Two paid for social media ads failed to make sufficiently clear that wine investment was unregulated, that the value of investments was variable and that examples of past performance weren’t necessarily a guide to the future. The ads also referenced an example of performance that wasn’t representative and m...

  • Vinverum Ltd

    • Upheld
    • 13 November 2024

    A paid-for Facebook ad failed to make sufficiently clear that wine investment was unregulated and that the value of investments was variable and also made unsubstantiated investment claims.

  • CurrencyWave Ltd t/a CurrencyWave

    • Upheld
    • 06 November 2024

    A website for a foreign currency payments service misleadingly implied they conducted foreign exchange payments and were FCA authorised, and also used inaccurate cost comparison information.

  • Webloyalty International Ltd t/a Webloyalty, Complete Savings

    • Upheld
    • 23 October 2024

    Two in-app ads and a pop-up banner ad for a shopper reward programme weren't clearly identifiable as ads and didn't make the presentation of choices clear.  

  • Webloyalty International Ltd t/a Webloyalty, Complete Savings

    • Upheld
    • 23 October 2024

    Three webpages on a website for a shopper reward programme failed to make clear the steps that people had to take to obtain a 'welcome reward'.    

  • Sky UK Ltd t/a NOW

    • Upheld
    • Internet (website content)
    • 25 September 2024

    A website for Now TV was misleading as it didn’t make it sufficiently clear that free trials, which were automatically added to the basket, would auto-renew at a fee unless cancelled.

  • Debenhams Brands Ltd t/a Debenhams

    • Upheld
    • Social media (paid ad)
    • 31 July 2024

    A paid-for Facebook ad for Debenhams made misleading and unsubstantiated savings claims

  • The Benenden Healthcare Society Ltd

    • Upheld
    • 24 July 2024

    A TV and Radio ad for private health insurance mislead consumers by omitting material information about a healthcare plan, including significant exclusions relating to treatment options.

  • Avensure Ltd t/a Employment Law Advice Bureau

    • Upheld
    • 22 May 2024

    A direct mailing to a business was not obviously identifiable as an ad.

  • Whitbread Group plc t/a Premier Inn, Beefeater

    • Upheld
    • Search (paid)
    • 01 May 2024

    A paid-for search ad made misleading claims about the price of hotel rooms.

  • Nationwide Building Society t/a Nationwide

    • Upheld
    • Press general, Television, Radio
    • 03 April 2024

    TV, radio and press ads for Nationwide were misleading as consumers were likely to understand that the building society had made a long-term decision not to close their branches and that they had not recently closed any branches when this was not the case.

  • Aldi Stores Ltd t/a Aldi

    • Upheld
    • National press
    • 20 March 2024

    A wrap around national press ad made misleading comparative claims which could not be verified, as well as a misleading claim about prices compared to last year.

Informally resolved (1)
  • House of Fraser Ltd

    • 17 July 2024
    • Number of complaints: 0

    Media: Email
    Topic: Pricing and charges