Computers, phones and telecoms

Helpful information on the advertising rules for ads that reference, or include products/services relating to computers, phones and telecoms.

There are plenty of options for consumers when it comes to telecom services. In general, any ads that feature digital services or products, including computers, printers, phones or sat-nav’s, must not mislead consumers and advertisers should always hold evidence to back up any claims made about the performance of the product. All descriptions of the product should also be accurate e.g. size and dimensions.

Naturally advertisers will want to showcase why their telecoms package is the best; whether that’s because it is the cheapest on the market, or the fastest. As an example, broadband providers are often prolific advertisers who promote a variety of different packages for their broadband, line rental or TV channels. We have conducted extensive customer research to understand how consumers view these deals and whether they understand what the product will provide based on the ad. This research has influenced the advertising rules we enforce.

It’s important that advertisers show an all-inclusive monthly cost in their ads and don’t separate out the price of certain compulsory services, such as line rental when consumers sign-up for a broadband package. They also must give prominence to the contract length, any post-discount pricing, and any up-front costs such as delivery fees, installation fees etc. Up-front costs should also be combined in to one all-inclusive fee.

“Unlimited” claims are only permitted if the user incurs no additional charge or suspension of service as a consequence of exceeding any usage threshold. Any limitations imposed by the telecoms provider must be moderate and clearly explained in the ad.

Any speed claims should be based on the actual experience of users and advertisers need to be able to demonstrate on request that the speeds they advertise can be achieved by at least 10% of their customers. Any factors that are likely to cause customers to receive speeds significantly below those claimed in the ad, should be prominent and clearly stated.

+ Read more - Show less

Latest rulings

EE Ltd t/a EE
- Part upheld
- Poster (digital static image)
- 15 July 2026
A digital poster for EE didn’t make sure their comparative claims were verifiable. Another issue was also investigated but it didn’t break our rules.
Grain Connect Ltd
- Upheld
- Email
- 08 July 2026
An email from a broadband company made misleading price rise claims about an identifiable competitor.
Practice Pal t/a Involve Education (Involve)
- Upheld
- Website (own site)
- 25 February 2026
A website for a management information services software provider for schools made misleading and unverifiable comparative claims about competitors’ products.
Vodafone Ltd
- Upheld
- Poster, Social media (paid ad), Television
- 07 January 2026
Six ads for Vodafone were misleading by making an implied comparative claim without objectively comparing one or more specific verifiable features.

View all rulings

Computers, phones and telecoms

Helpful information on the advertising rules for ads that reference, or include products/services relating to computers, phones and telecoms.

Latest news

AI and Deepfakes: Four Things Advertisers Need to Know Before They Hit “Run”

Three key tips for green claims this Earth Day

Thinking outside of the (loot) box

Eye-catching Effects and Epilepsy

A CAP Icesight into ads for the Winter Olympics

VAT’s the Way to Do It: Get your pricing ads right

Latest rulings

EE Ltd t/a EE

Grain Connect Ltd

Practice Pal t/a Involve Education (Involve)

Vodafone Ltd

Help getting it right

Popular advice

Consultation on changes to the rules on premium-rate telephone service advertising

Broadband and Telecoms: Pricing and charges

Regulatory statement - Mid-contract price rises in telecoms ads

Relevant codes

10 Use of data for marketing